Responsibility & Reciprocity

It’s your turn to make the drive!

Ross Boulton a couple of days ago posted this piece – an apology, of sorts.

(rossboulton1.substack.c…)

Except, he doesn’t get it!

Paula, does – it’s about shared responsibility and reciprocity. 

And all Boulton can say is “That is not called for, Paula”! That’s it. 

She’s pointing out it’s his turn to make the drive north to New Brunswick.

Boulton even ends the piece with this:

Because the day she (his cousin) does decide to make the drive, I don’t want her sitting at the end of my road in the dark, doing the math on whether it’s worth pulling in.

He doesn’t get it – it’s his turn to make the trip!

His cousin (a New Brunswicker) is not coming back – likely ever – and he’s not going to understand why – typically American! Self-centred. Not reaching out to do his part in the relationship. 

Doesn’t occur to him he has a part!

Am I annoyed?

You bet!


BTW

Turns out Boulton’s “story” is a fiction – he wrote me:

I’ve made that drive more times than I can count. My dog has been to Canada more than most Americans have.

Of course its 2 ways. What wasn’t called for is the personal attack.

The fictional family who hasn’t gone yet is in today’s Sunday Lunch. They’re at the table working out what it would take now.

My point is, however, in the story he doesn’t acknowledge the reciprocity of the relationship – he lays it all on “her”. 

I wrote back that maybe the story reveals more about him than he realized! He doesn’t use it as an opportunity to comment on his responsibilities in the relationship. Nowhere in the “story” does he acknowledge maybe Americans need to be willing to see beyond themselves. 

If he is actually planning on continuing the “story” (as he implies) – he better recognize the immediate context: yesterday, Canada told trump to go F*&K himself. Canadians are in NO mood to kowtow to American self-centred pity (American reporting of the collapse of the trade talks is complete BS, he should perhaps read Canadian (or at least British) accounts of what actually took place). 

“He” the American in the story, better make it clear what he’s personally prepared to do to make amends, not just an apology, but something concrete like actually getting in the car and driving to NB with “his honey”!

The Day After – Phew, Carney didn’t cave…

I came across a Substack post by a “sympathetic” American this morning: 

Ross Boulton

My Fellow Americans: Canadian Porch Light Off

The Story…

Read more

It’s an interesting read – here are snippets of what he had to say:

Two hundred and seventy-one years. Eleven generations. …. And through the whole of it, somebody up there kept a light on for somebody down here.

I send honey in December, two quarts packed in newspaper, from hives in a field off the parish road. She sends back mustard pickle, and every year I tell her it’s too sour, and every year she sends it anyway….

This year the pickle came. A card came with it. Three sentences and an initial:

“We’re not coming down. It isn’t you. Love to all of you. — Y.”…

And here’s the thing I’ve been counting up since the card came. She drove. Every time, for thirty years, it was her car and her thirty-one hours and her cooler on my counter. I have never once made that drive north. It never occurred to me that I should, because the light was always on up there and a light that’s always on is easy to stop noticing….

I went out last night and put a bulb in the fixture on my own back step. Sixty watts. There’s nobody coming up those steps from New Brunswick, this year or probably next.

It isn’t her Canadian porch light that went off – it’s been his American “friendly” light that never was turned on (and he never noticed, right)! 

I had to leave a comment:

Last evening I mentioned to a friend that the number of US inquiries regarding Canadian ancestry this past year in PEI increased approximately 1000%! Says something about lots of Americans and their disillusionment with what’s happening at home.

I also said, “We don’t want them here.” She said, “Don’t paint them all with the same brush.” I said, “I do – our values are fundamentally different than theirs!”

She got in the car for, what, 30 years and drove her pickles to you and it didn’t even cross your mind to reciprocate? Not once?

That’s the difference I’m talking about – deeply ingrained, unconscious values that violate mine and were you to move to Canada you’d be moving the needle in the wrong direction – more of Canada would begin to experience the selfish discontent we’re seeing played out in Alberta.

I sure don’t want any of it in NS! Not now, not ever!

Maybe she won’t bring her pickles to you.

Maybe you could just drive your honey to her?

The light on your porch means nothing (you had to go buy a bulb and screw it in – so looks like yours was off and you didn’t notice ) – get in your vehicle, pay the cost of gas (which isn’t cheap), and deliver the goddam honey.

Maybe you could arrive at a dark back porch (although her light probably isn’t off, BTW), and you know what?

You could walk up the path and knock politely on the door!

That’s the difference – they don’t notice. “Me, me, me” is so deeply ingrained they can’t notice. The difference is, in Canada our Tommy Douglas roots say we are responsible for one another, and we act on that in all kinds of ways, DEI, not the least of it (well, not so much in Alberta, but that’s another rant).

Even the most sympathetic Americans arrive expecting the porch light to be on, when theirs burned out years ago. They want an escape from the “chaos” they’ve been unconsciously supporting all these years. Maybe they didn’t vote “trump” in 2025. But they’re not engaged in the big resistance fight, they’re looking for an escape to Canada. 

I’ve been helping out several Afghan refugee families over the past four years, and what’s been obvious to me has been their efforts to retain cultural identity while trying to become more Canadian. It’s hard being first generation in a new country, I see them struggle every day trying to balance the old and new.

Americans coming to Canada aren’t remotely aware there’s any adapting to do – they think they’re “like us” – haven’t a clue they’re not!

Stay home, stand and fight if you’re not happy with how America has turned out. Use your vote wisely. Actively join the resistance. Do your part to change the direction. 

Maybe we should turn off our porch light to those American cousins who eye Canada as a refuge; help them see that escaping to Canada won’t solve their problems for them.

“Make Pete Hoekstra Persona Non Grata”

I signed this petition a couple of days ago when Charlie Angus first mentioned it – it won’t bring down Hoekstra – that’s not the point. If, as Charlie mentions near the end of the piece, several hundred thousand Canadian citizens sign the petition, Carney can shrug and say Canadians are angry – he’s not going to do anything before August 19 (or likely afterward) but it gives him negotiating power with this CUSMA deadline. Even if an actual deal gets worked out by next week, and even if trump signs it, it still won’t be worth the paper it’s written on. But signing the petition makes it clear Canadians ARE angry. The link is mid-way through Charlie’s piece.

And you might consider passing the Angus posting on to others – we might actually reach some kind of large number of signatures….

If you are a Canadian citizen, please sign parliamentary e-petition 7531 calling on the government of Canada to make Ambassador Pete Hoekstra persona non grata. https://www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-7531

Does a parliamentary petition have the power to force Pete Hoekstra out of the country? No, but if enough people sign, then it forces a conversation about the role the US Embassy is playing in interfering in our affairs and working to sabotage our longstanding relations with our ext-door neighbour.

The petition sends a message to Washington that Canadians are not intimidated or fooled by the constant gaslighting coming from the US Embassy in Ottawa.

Judith

Here’s Charlie’s Substack piece:

https://charlieangus.substack.com/p/make-pete-hoekstra-persona-non-grata?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2946092&post_id=210646928&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=cgren&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

BTW – Our Canadian media are misrepresenting Canada’s negotiating strength in these meetings!

If you haven’t found Shankar Narayan he’s worth keeping tabs on:

Canada’s Hand Against Trump Just Got Stronger

Canada Is Entering the CUSMA Fight From Strength

https://conciscanada.substack.com/p/canadas-hand-against-trump-just-got?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=8151447&post_id=210886872&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=cgren&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

There are other writers I’m reading these days – a couple of military analysts (who see the situation very differently than the MSM are reporting.) I’ll not bore you with a list of names, but if you hop over to my Substack and tap into my Notes, you will find a lot of support for how Canada IS handling these and all those international agreements that are coming together fast and furiously. The picture is incredibly interesting.

One interesting piece I’ve read this afternoon puts a lot of what’s going on in a very interesting global perspective:

https://substack.com/@judithnewman/note/c-313504631?r=cgren&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web

Things are happening – and more important – not being handled well, if at all, by our Canadian press, tv news outlets.