Why protest matters…

I had a conversation yesterday with a friend who was worried that protesting was meaningless – that nothing changed afterward.

After yesterday’s No Kings protests, there are two points of view I want to share – first, this piece from MSNow.

ms.now/opinion/no-kings…

The No Kings protests that took place across the country this weekend were massive. These demonstrations continue to drive home how Trump’s presidency is not only unpopular, but unpopular in a manner that infuriates and mobilizes people. But something is missing, writes Zeeshan Aleem. There is an absence of friction. The contained and routine choreography of these demonstrations every few months is central to their mass appeal, and, paradoxically, it is also what limits their power. Americans interested in using collective action to push back against Trump’s authoritarian agenda will need to show more ambition and creativity to move the dial.

In other words, protest, in and of itself, won’t get you where you want to get.

The second is Tim Snyder’s 1 minute explanation for why joining the protests matters: substack.com/@snyder/no…

Protests

  1. change the atmosphere;
  2. they change the sense of what’s normal;
  3. show people who aren’t protesting that others see what’s wrong, see a different future – maybe they’ll come along next time;
  4. they’re a first step toward working with other people;
  5. because protesting build coalitions, and coalitions win elections – they help people make the connections with the ongoing work needed to organize the vote

(That’s my synopsis of Snyder’s brief video)

In other words, protests set the stage for bringing people together to set up the work that needs to follow.

This just in from Joyce Vance:

The national protests are that first step toward pushing against trump’s authoritarian agenda; No Kings is the immediate face of the growing coalition that knows it now must turn its efforts to organizing for the November elections – if you read the newsletters from 50501 and Indivisible, for example, you see they understand what they have to do next!

Some people have suggested these marches are meaningless. But that is not true. Today, we put Donald Trump and his cronies on notice that we are coming for them at the ballot boxes and that we understand how this democracy works and who holds the power. By showing up, we show that we are not afraid. That we will jump through whatever hoops they put in front of us to vote. Be wary of anyone who tries to convince you that people like us aren’t powerful in a democracy—it smacks of trolls, or worse.

I’ve heard from many people this week expressing sentiments similar to what one Civil Discourse reader wrote to me today: “We sense some of the Republican voters in our area are beginning to grasp, and question, the costs of their loyalty.” Courage is contagious, and we spread it by showing up today and continuing to push for democracy.

In Freeport, Maine, where I was, we saw children, teenagers, and young people lining Main Street in increasing numbers as the morning drew on. I hear that’s the case across the country. Young people engaged, fired up, marching. We need more of them!

And I guess a final word to Michael Cohen:

Yesterday was loud. It was visible. It was, in many ways, inspiring.

But if it does not translate into ballots, into turnout, into sustained pressure, it becomes just another moment. Another headline. Another day where people felt good about showing up before going back to a system that continues, largely unchanged.

Still, I walked away from 7th Avenue with something I did not expect. A cautious sense of optimism.

Not because everything is fine. It is not. Not because the system suddenly fixed itself. It did not. But because people showed up. In massive numbers. For different reasons. With different grievances. But with a shared understanding that something is not right.

And sometimes, that is where change begins.

The Handmaid’s Tale: A Reality

It started with Project 2025! This new report – Saving America by Saving the Family: A Foundation for the Next 250 Years – is chilling. It’s all tied in with the SAVE act stripping the vote from married women.

Opposition to the Iran war matters, yes.

This matters more!

And now comes phase two.

The same ideological engine, led by The Heritage Foundation, has introduced a new blueprint with a name so polished, so deceptively reassuring, that it almost dares you not to question it: “Saving America by Saving the Family: A Foundation for the Next 250 Years.”

Read that again. Slowly.

Because buried inside that title is the rebranding of control as virtue.

If Project 2025 was about seizing the machinery of government, this new manifesto is about reshaping the lives that government governs. One targets institutions. The other targets identity. Together, they form something far more comprehensive than policy.

They form a system.

A system designed not to force compliance outright, but to make any alternative increasingly impossible.

And at the center of that system is one objective: redefine the role of women in America by narrowing the scope of their freedom until what remains looks less like choice and more like inevitability.

Michael Cohen

“Project 2025 And The Hidden War On Women”

American women – please take the time to read the report – Saving America by Saving the Family: A Foundation for the Next 250 Years : [https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/report/saving-america-saving-the-family-foundation-the-next-250-years].

It’s chilling.

It needs to be disseminated widely on university campuses – it will shape our young women’s lives irreparably! 

Young women need help to fight their subjugation!

Margaret Atwood clearly anticipated what was coming!

A synopsis of where we are today

This Globe and Mail article which just arrived in my inbox gives a reasonable synopsis of where trump stands in the midst of all the chaos he’s created.

Iran has a plan:

The strategic aim is higher oil prices and economic pain, which it hopes will push everyone from American allies to American voters to demand that the Trump administration back down. 

The gas pump is the global economy’s Achilles heel, and Mr. Trump’s.

trump doesn’t.

The Gulf states warned the Trump administration against starting this war, because it was obvious how Iran would respond. As predicted, it has used drones and mines – small, cheap, easy to deploy, hard to find – to target the six countries on the other side of the Persian Gulf, which collectively constitute the world’s largest oil exporter, and to prevent them from exporting oil through the narrow waters of the Strait of Hormuz.

None of us knows how this chaos is going to play out.

The current war … features remarkable feats of American military technology, but it’s difficult to see to what end. There are of course upsides in further weakening a weak Iran, but the many downsides seem to have been ignored. 

And the definition of victory? Mr. Trump said last week that the war would end when he felt it in his bones.

Iran is run by autocrats who are patient and know how to play chess. Mr. Trump is no chess grandmaster, and he is not patient. 

This war may end with Mr. Trump having to back down, leaving the global economy damaged and U.S. standing in the Middle East diminished. Or worse: Mr. Trump may call the Iranian bluff, as they have called his, by ramping up militarily – with results that could be far worse for the region, the global economy and the world.

You should be able to open the article: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/gift/ce1154b0fb7016029672dbecd2cb6d9f9042517ccd143b074f8c8c8ffb9fc4fe/34P6EAN6PVBS7IKFHZWG76TMG4/

It’s worth the 5 minutes it will take you to read it.

Pot Calling The Kettle Black

Came across this the other day (https://substack.com/@canadianreturnee/note/c-225898094?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=cgren).

Sums it up extremely well – there are no “good” guys waging this war. The hatred, the misogyny, the incompetence, the arrogance, the corruption – there’s no side to choose – both are equally dreadful.

If anything, in my world, trump scores higher on all these (and many other) criteria I could add to the list.

I find myself in the bizarre situation of actually offering a small, private fist-pump (“yes”) when Iran manages to hit another US installation, when they decide to let Chinese and a few other country’s ships safely through the Strait of Hormuz as a way of thumbing their nose at trump.

Just surviving is winning for the Iranians.

There is NO WINNING in this conflict for trump.

trump may declare he’s won, but the fact that Iran still stands makes a lie out of his claims. In the end Iran will survive – likely badly damaged, but standing, nevertheless. In the end, Iran will rebuild – maybe not quite the Iran from before the bombing, but their nation will continue to exist and it will continue to oppose the US and Israel. trump has made that a certainty.

I find myself saying out loud to non-US NATO members – it’s trump’s mess, let him clean it up. He didn’t want “help” – now is not the time to enter the war, and certainly not on trump’s side!

God only knows how this mess ends. Who can be a reliable broker between these two crazy regimes? If all there is on offer are “trump’s terms” – this war will go on for much longer than trump can imagine!

And now is not the time to forget Ukraine! NATO (without the US) has to keep supporting Ukraine – we all need to help the Ukrainians survive! https://u24.gov.ua

Two things you should read today

Charlie Angus’ latest Substack is a must read for Canadians:

Simon Tisdall writing in the guardian states, “Know your enemy is the first lesson of war – and Britain’s enemy is now Donald Trump.”

This is a lesson that ordinary Canadians have known for well over a year. Trump continues to taunt us and belittle our nation in the same way that Putin ridiculed Ukraine prior to the invasion.

Canadians are like Ukrainians in many ways. When pushed to the wall, we have spines of steel. When forced to choose between Vimy or Vichy, I know where ordinary Canadians will be. There is no return to normal.

Canada’s future is tied with Ukraine. If Putin is allowed to win, Trump may be willing to try his luck bombing our cities and trying to terrify our civilians.

The second one from Viktor Kravchuk:

https://viktorkravchuk.substack.com/p/every-one-of-us-came-from-a-woman

I write often about courage here.
About resilience, about hope.
About strength.
But today is International Women’s Day.
And this is the day to remember that many of the greatest lessons about courage do not come from war, from politics, or from history books.
They come from women.
Because for many women, courage is not a heroic act.
It is everyday life.
The courage to prove your value again and again in a world where men have long been used to holding power.
The courage to speak in places where your voice is questioned, and to carry responsibilities that often remain invisible.
In a world that has often tried to crush your voice and your possibilities.
A courage that rarely receives applause.
And here you are.
Still carrying life forward.

I responded to Charlie Angus:

https://substack.com/@judithnewman/note/c-225279675
I feel it, for sure. I’ve felt it from the moment trump made open threats against our sovereignty. 

This is a lesson that ordinary Canadians have known for well over a year. Trump continues to taunt us and belittle our nation in the same way that Putin ridiculed Ukraine prior to the invasion.

Canadians are like Ukrainians in many ways. When pushed to the wall, we have spines of steel. When forced to choose between Vimy or Vichy, I know where ordinary Canadians will be. There is no return to normal.

Canada’s future is tied with Ukraine. If Putin is allowed to win, Trump may be willing to try his luck bombing our cities and trying to terrify our civilians.

I’m 83. That doesn’t mean I have to sit back and watch what’s unfolding. I’m trying to do my part – make sure other Canadians understand what’s going on and what we will have to do about it.

Look no further than Ukraine.

If you aren’t reading Viktor Kravchuk you should be.

We must be prepared. Each one of us will have a role in sustaining Canada. 

trump IS THE ENEMY!

_____________________________

It’s a sunny morning here in Halifax. 

It’s 8°. 

The snow is melting. 

Patches of grass are visible. 

You can small spring in the air.

Treasure the calm moments you have. 

It makes me furious!

These facts suggest two interpretive frameworks: a foreign war as a mechanism to destroy democracy at home; and a foreign war as an element of personal corruption by the president of the United States. [Timothy Snyder, Feb 28 2026]

I’d say both are at play!

We shall see how Trump’s misguided idea that engaging in conflict can benefit him will play out, and as a mostly captured U.S. media focuses fully on the war he wanted, let’s think about all the things they are not paying attention to: Trump’s overwhelming presence in the Epstein files, the tanking U.S. economy, his plan to “fix” our elections, and his myriad corrupt deals. [Ruth Ben-Ghiat, Feb 28 2026]

[Heather cox Richardson offers a very clear synopsis of why this “war”: https://open.substack.com/pub/heathercoxrichardson/p/february-28-2026?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=post%20viewer]

And then there’s Carney’s reply:

Prime Minister Mark Carney backed US air strikes on Iran, saying Tehran is the main source of instability in the Middle East and must never be allowed to possess nuclear weapons. [secure.campaigner.com/c…]

This is one of those quagmire situations – the Iranian regime has been an international threat since 1979 or so. So, yes, I might want to see its power diminished and maybe support the regime’s downfall.

But that isn’t going to happen by the US and Israel attacking the Iranian civilian population! And this attack by the US/Israel is so obviously duplicitous for a host of reasons that have nothing to do with regime change.

So when the PM of Canada “backs US air strikes on Iran” – it enrages me! Better he should keep his mouth shut than stand up for this outrage being perpetrated by the US/Israel!

Carney’s motivation is also a misdirection – he’s siding with the US here because he hopes it will soften trump’s trade stance against Canada (negotiations for CUSMA are starting soon) – that’s pie in the sky thinking. I don’t believe CUSMA can be reworked this time around, not because the negotiators aren’t capable, but because trump won’t accept anything other than surrender and Canada is going to have to walk away.

According to Charlie Angus (Mar 1 2026):

Perhaps the thinking in Ottawa is that by becoming mired in a Middle East war, Trump will be distracted from his obsession with breaking our nation.

Playing nice with crocodiles in the hope that they will be nice to us never ends well.

I reacted yesterday [Feb 28 2026]:

Carney’s statement makes me furious!

“Canada’s position remains clear: the Islamic Republic of Iran is the principal source of instability and terror throughout the Middle East, has one of the world’s worst human rights records, and must never be allowed to obtain or develop nuclear weapons,” the Prime Minister said.

“Canada supports the United States acting to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and to prevent its regime from further threatening international peace and security,” he said.

Except this isn’t what trump is up to – he desperately needs a distraction from the Epstein files which are proving more than personally dangerous; he needs a distraction from mounting opposition to the impact of tariffs and health care costs escalation, he needs to protect the patronage he’s receiving from the Arab states (“enemies” of Iran).

None of this is about stopping Iran’s nuclear ambitions. They’re all playing games! For Carney to be the first (and so far, the only as far as I can tell from what I’ve seen in the “news”) head of state to lick-ass raises my blood pressure into unsafe territory. 

He didn’t need to do it. He shouldn’t have done it! 

I hate what’s been happening to the CBC!

Charlie Angus’ Substack piece this morning is about how he feels he’s being “gaslit” all the time – by the CBC, by the US Ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, by several political writers. (Read the piece – it’s another strong bit of writing worth thinking about.)

Half way through I knew I had to respond because I’ve been feeling the same way, about the CBC, The Globe and Mail, my local news sources. The CBC is where I go for news, but for quite a while now what passes for “news” just makes me angry.

What you’re seeing with the CBC is very real! A friend of mine has for many years been a political commentator on our local community oriented programs and she describes several recent meetings with CBC personnel where she and the other panelists have been told to “tone down the political stuff!” She’s furious – the point of those panel discussions is to make the political explicit. Her take – the CBC is terrified of pp (at their convention last week the Conservatives just reaffirmed their plans to close down the CBC). She, and the other panelists keep sneaking in their political views, yes watered down some (she enjoys the gig and wants to keep doing it but I’m guessing there’s a line she will refuse to cross and will find other outlets to tell it like she sees it).

As a dedicated CBC listener, I’m just angry all the time with the banal, often subtle anti-government/anti-Carney position constantly being passed off as “news”. I read The Globe and Mail opinion columnists some of whom still dare to push back against the escalating economic warfare being waged against us by trump and his cronies, but the “news” pieces are often wishy-washy – afraid to call out what’s really happening.

One topic that has me screaming is the blaming our federal government for the rising food (and other commodity) prices as if Carney can wave a magic wand to fix what is a global issue! The Canadian press keeps harping on pp’s claim that he can fix it – I say B**LSH**T to that! The cost of living is definitely higher, it definitely is a challenge for more and more people, but really folks? There isn’t a whole lot any government can do to change that directly. And our government, right now is doing what it can to make it a bit easier for those most seriously impacted. If pp thinks he can do any better, he’s plain out of his mind. But it makes good talking points on the CBC, doesn’t it!

We’ve got to stop holding our breath…

From The Globe and Mail, Jan 26 2026 (read the whole article):

Trump wants to make an example out of Canada. How will we prepare?

There is no deal to be made! That’s been obvious from the get go. Yes, go through the motions, but know, in the end, we have to walk away and bear the brunt of the illegal costs that asshole will attempt to levy on us! For cost us it will, whether we accept trump’s terms or walk away!

Those, prominent on social media, who urge us to “be vewy vewy quiet” in response – to say or do nothing that might irritate His Orange Majesty, lest we put the USMCA talks at risk – are therefore not only craven: They are deluding themselves. The prize on which they urge us to keep our eyes is not self-evidently a prize at all. Of course, other things being equal, we would prefer USMCA to no USMCA. But other things may not be equal: It will depend on the terms. And if we want an agreement on terms that are remotely acceptable, we have to be ready to walk away from the negotiating table – to walk away from the USMCA, if it comes to that.

Their final note:

Can we, in a crisis, rapidly mobilize the materials and manpower needed to bring it under control? Can we, in so doing, reduce the societal cost of externally imposed shocks of this kind, signal to others our ability to endure them, and so make it less likely they will be tried? And if not, what do we need to do to make this possible?

We are in a lot of trouble, and we need to move fast. We have little ability to predict Mr. Trump’s actions, and no reason to confine our imagination to what is reasonable or even practical. It is not enough to hope for the best. We have to plan for the worst.

Deal or no deal – the costs will be the same – punishing, unless we as Canadians stand with one another, elbows up, defiant!

The folks of Minneapolis have shown us a path – their organizing has been stellar, teams collecting goods and food to share, teams delivering what’s been needed, teams of whistleblowers, teams of video recorders, people behind the scenes organizing all sorts of activities public and not so visible.

There’s been talk of a 400,000 strong Canadian civilian resistance force – more people than you can imagine are ready to step up and begin the organizing – the idea has been floated, but I have no idea where I sign up!

If the government is intending to take the lead on this it better act soon. However, we don’t have to wait, in fact lots of people have already started coming together to connect – Charlie Angus’ “Resistance” movement is growing steadily.

The playbook of organizations like Indivisible and 50501 are readily available – suggestions for the formation of diffuse, grassroots collectives with clear, active agendas – are already at hand. We don’t need to reinvent this wheel; we just need to start calling on neighbours, finding friends and allies also ready to act.

The slow peeling off from trump of Republican Representatives and Senators is entirely due to the massive call/email efforts of the many opposition organizations actively applying pressure. Just another aspect of the work of a vibrant defiant population.

In Canada it’s hard right now because we’re all busy holding our breath; we’ve been holding our breath for over a year (actually a lot longer than that) waiting for our Minneapolis moment. It’s going to come, sooner than later, and rather being caught on our back foot we should be able to stand defiant already knowing neighbours are standing with us, each helping the other in whatever way we can, in whatever way is needed.

During WWII Canadian women picked up the slack when the men went overseas. We can do it again! Our men won’t be going overseas, they will certainly be on the ramparts with us.

Time for all of us to get moving!

“Lies, violence and the American state”

Marc Elias is one of many American lawyers engaged in litigating the lawless actions of the trump regime. He began an independent newsletter a number of years ago when he saw the mainstream media supporting the lies of the regime. Today’s piece is definitely worth reading – my title is his title. Today’s piece is based on Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s push back against the Soviet authoritarian lies:

When violence bursts onto the peaceful human condition, its face is flush with self-assurance. It displays on its banner and proclaims: “I am Violence! Make way, step aside, I will crush you!” But violence ages swiftly. A few years pass — and it is no longer sure of itself. To prop itself up, to appear decent, it will without fail call forth its ally —Lies. For violence has nothing to cover itself with but lies, and lies can only persist through violence. [Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]

Elias continues:

“But as Solzhenitsyn predicted, the violence we are witnessing every day in Minneapolis and elsewhere has proven deeply unpopular. It is indecent, arbitrary and cruel. Its tactics violate our rights as Americans to protest our government. Its purpose violates our moral conscience as human beings.

As a result, that violence has quickly required the support of lies to perpetuate itself.

Donald Trump is an infamous liar. He has lied his way through business, law and politics. The movement he built is based on lies — lies about the economy, immigration and crime. But its most important lie — the Big Lie — is about democracy itself.

Trump abhors democracy because it allows ordinary Americans to reject his lies. Even worse for Trump, it allows us to reject him.

When voters did exactly that in 2020, he responded with more lies — lies in court, lies in the media, and lies to his supporters. On Jan. 6, 2021, those lies turned into violence.”

Elias ends his piece with:

“his (Solzhenitsyn) prescription for resisting authoritarianism remains sound. We must combat lies in every way we can. It is not enough to condemn the violence and protest it; we must also condemn the lying and resist it.

Regardless of the risk or the sense of futility, we must commit ourselves to bearing witness to the truth and proclaiming it to anyone who will listen:

  • Donald Trump lost the 2020 election.
  • Renée Good was shot in the face while trying to turn her car and leave.
  • Alex Pretti was beaten by six federal agents and then shot and killed.
  • The federal government is violating the constitutional rights of its citizens.
  • Trump and the DOJ are violating federal law by refusing to release the Epstein files.
  • Trump and the GOP are preparing to subvert the 2026 election.

Solzhenitsyn lived the next two decades in exile until the lies of the Soviet Union led to its collapse. His campaign against the lies in his country proved prophetic. He taught us that authoritarianism prevails not because people stop believing the truth, but because they stop saying it aloud. If we wish to remain free, we must refuse that silence.”

These are the facts that the trump regime wants to bury.

These are the facts that matter in the US. But we, in Canada, must also be on the watch for the lies – for our government leaders, on both sides of the aisle, are prone to lying to us, too; not so loudly, not so ferociously, perhaps not so frequently, but there are lies – or, if not lies, conflicting decisions that undercut the values on which we try to base our civil society. We need to be alert for the lies and evasions, ready to call out our government and our parliamentary opposition when they obfuscate or outright lie.

The truth matters here as well as in the US. We, too, must refuse silence.

I think I count 9 flowers on my Amaryllis today – both stalks are almost in full bloom. Each stalk has 6 flower buds, I don’t think I will see all six on both stalks open at the same time, but it sure is close today!

I’ve been quiet…

I’ve been quiet for quite a while – I mean, what can anyone say about the insanity and chaos each new day brings?

Well this week I’ve seen a couple of items I want to share.

First, a video “The Hungry Giant” from the Greenland Defense Fund. You may have to watch it a couple of times because the Greenlander singing has a strong accent in English, but the subtitles help. It sums up how Greenlanders are feeling about trump’s threatened takeover of their island!

Second is a post by William A. Finnegan following Carney’s speech at Davos, yesterday.

For those waiting for the moment in history when someone finally shouts “The British are coming!” — when the signal is unmistakable and the decision obvious — this is as close as it gets.

Not because anyone raised their voice.

But because someone who understands how the system actually works stopped pretending.

Mark Carney’s address at Davos was not a speech in the conventional sense. It was a declaration delivered calmly, to an audience that did not need it explained.

We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.

I thought the critical comment came near the end of his speech:

If we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu.

[If you prefer to read Carney’s speech, you can get to it here.]

Today, trump called us (Canadians) ingrates for not accepting US dominance as generosity. What he doesn’t understand is Canadians, for the most part, are prepared to call out bullies and stand up to them. We’re going to be called upon to do that more and more in the coming weeks and months.

That gets me to CUSMA. I haven’t seen a way forward with CUSMA since trump was inaugurated a year ago! There is no way trump will negotiate any deal that is anything other than a total shakedown of our economy!

Call me a pessimist, but it’s economic warfare! It’s blatantly obvious! The cost to each of us in Canada is going to be real, and we’re going to have to support our federal government however this plays out.

At some point, in the not too distant future, we’re going to have to stand and fight! It’ll be costly but what price our identity and our democracy? Eh?